![]() If you choose not to stick with Photos for OS X, or you want to explore your options before 2015, here are some applications that currently manage photo libraries. ![]() When you re-open that library in iPhoto, the app will still be able to work with your images they’ll just be stored elsewhere. If you own Aperture, you can alternately open your iPhoto libraries in Aperture and relocate the images from there. Start storing photos outside the iPhoto library file. The library includes much more than just the image files, including thumbnails of various sizes, database files, and a maze of nested folders. If you’re itching to jump to something else, or want to start preparing for an eventual switch, here are a few practical steps you can take right now.Īperture and iPhoto by default store your photos in a single library file (which is actually a “package,” a folder that OS X presents as a single file). Begin freeing your photos from iPhoto or Aperture I suspect that will be the approach of Photos, pointing to a (hopefully) smooth migration process. Metadata and adjustments applied in Aperture that iPhoto doesn’t have inputs for are simply ignored. Currently, you can open a photo library in either application without converting the data. Second, Apple has said that users will be able to migrate their existing photo libraries to Photos for OS X when the application arrives in “early 2015.” We don’t yet know what that migration process will look like, but it will probably be a built-in step the first time you run Photos that converts the library, just as previous updates to iPhoto and Aperture have done over the years.Ī big advantage on this front is the fact that iPhoto and Aperture share the same library format. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |